IS IT TIME?

In the light of new forms of knowledge,the time has come fo holisticvision of that wich is in us and thet wich suounds us;observations from different viewpoints and attemps toappropiate those large and small truths wich valorize what is considered acceptable.
Human behavior and thought processes are still not fully detached from geocentric conception of existence even thoght many centuries have passed.
To enhance progress in knowledge it is essential to include in  each individual's cognitive process knowledge of the bigger picture,a synthesis of what one considers acceptable as truth and unchangeable.
It is a difficult phaseto fulfil ;the necessary qualities fo evaluation and effective action are influenced by those who consider themselves to be the repositotories of truth and have the capability of transmitting it.
The conviction that human beings are innately bad will continue to be espoused and for this reason it will be tolerated because it is by nature ineradicable.
Intellectual rigour requires us to consider that which,within personal limitation,we could know better.
We can surmise that in prehistoic eras some individual with a livelier mentality felt the need to establish his/her supremacy for the benefit of everyone.
Over time these societal calls amplified and strengthead creating national communities to become,and we are nearly there,the global village.
Humanity must keep in mind the human element which in a harmonius future will determine overall living and physical equilibrium as we humbly recognise that we are only one part of this ensemble.
We cannot forget that our planet is only a miniscule part of the universe and we are but the tiniest particles even if from time immemorial we have considered ourselves to be the greatest part.
Let us attempt,in the knowledge that man can only know small fragments of the whole of existence to reconstuct our role.
Do we have an impulse which drives us to seek the unknown in search of suitable answers to our questions ?thise impulse could be called cognitio rerum of filognosia.
The term-concept folognosia could be used which for centuries has enlightened rationality.
Philosophy in some professional circles is often characterised by a certain arrogance and,given the times,by lack of of objective support.
Humble Filognosia with its wider,coherent and more detailed picture than present vision allow.
However we acknowledge of existence.
Science with its relative certainties can povide temporary details of ulterior aspect;how long will  today's "scientific"certainties last in the future?
A relative and  feasible foundation can be found in the simple affirmation that for our existence to continue we need to create an ethical pragmatic equilibrium between the individual,the rest of humanity and the environment;we must be consious of our partiality operating in the totality of the earth,which,in is its turn,part of an another immensity.
The work carried out in different fields by those dedicated to investigating these relationships and their inter-connectedness is extremely important.
It is a very demanding task ;to examine closely interconnectedness it is necessary to step outside the hortus conclusus, to become infected,be aware of different situations and not lose sight of the natural regulation of the earth's components nor its position in the cosmos.
The important things to which we shall dedicate most of our attention are perhaps less important than the things we shall neglect.
The physical world and the world of thought are bound togheter;in oder to keep sight of the bigger picture and reach a synthesis,scientific research  must consider both realms and move away from the mental arrangement of investigating the two aspects separately


DA EQUILIBRIUM AND KNOWLEDGE  ed lulu